Tiwaking?  You're so hung up on arguing about anything anyone else says that you take things out of context to argue them, and provided some responses that are not only completely out of context but don't make any sense either.
A small example (I'm NOT going to pick them all out)

To propose that there is no creator is incredibly arrogant, because we are simply not capable of comprehending something so eternal and so vast....and to suggest that a creator as vast at the one who could have created our universe should give a fuck what any of us think is just me me me me, which is about the level most human beings settle at anyway.

Does God Care? You are also wrong, again.

Where did I say God doesn't care?  I said he's not concerned with our opinions.  

You're so obsessed with finding fault that you pick out a few words, read it wrong, and you won't concede the point of the rest of the statement (which I assume you agree with, because you didn't argue with it?)  This whole 'you're wrong, I'm right' thing is a very un-christian arrogance, BTW.

I'm out, this has turned into pointless mush.  :sunnies:

She's 100% correct. When you swear at someone you do two things. 1) Create intimidation. 2) Artificially obscures your point.
Scaring people into thinking like you achieves nothing. If scaring people into thinking like you worked, we wouldnt need torture.

1) Huh?  If you're a pussy, or it's an in-your-face shouting match.  Done properly, expletives aren't needed in that situation anyway  So expletives aren't aggressive, they're simply... emphatic, and therefore 2) serve sometimes to enhance your point.  :bounce:

The missus is right because regular use of expletives demeans the person using them, and they just don't fit into a well-worded and intelligent conversation.  This also helps to explain the Beer phenomenon.  It's all a matter of context - expletives can provide hours of entertainment when used properly.

'yom' is used in context to express the time wanted by the author.it is used to describe a random amont of time,a year or in this case 24hrs this was the authors context.

You're right about the variable, I originally worded the post to express a similar example, but it got edited out.  However, the suggestion that the author intended a 24hr time frame sounds like fundamentalist wishful thinking to me.  :sunnies:

It's been an interesting read in this thread, but I couldn't read it all, 'twas making me crosseyed.

The first and most fundamental question anyone, Christian or not, should ask themselves is:
How the fuck would I know? I'm a tiny speck on a small planet which itself is atomically small in relation to the known universe.

To propose that there is no creator is incredibly arrogant, because we are simply not capable of comprehending something so eternal and so vast.  To claim that a creator doesn't exist because evil does is an oxymoron of the first degree, and to suggest that a creator as vast at the one who could have created our universe should give a fuck what any of us think is just me me me me, which is about the level most human beings settle at anyway.  

We live in a universe of decay - we age and die like everything around us, so we have no understanding of eternity, of something that always existed and always will.

Science can't prove that it's all about evolution, and the Bible can't prove it's all about creation.  I've heard people say for years that of course there's evolution!  God prefers to do things the natural way!  See sentence 2 above.

Science is about facts as they are known.  Science inevitably gets it wrong, but you can only go with what you know at the time.  Needs constant effort to learn new things, to better understand what the hell's going on around here

Christianity is about faith, the opposite of science.  People of faith get it wrong too (like the guy who drowned believing he could walk on water).  Need constant reminders that their God, not them, is in charge.  :sunnies:

Hah didn't notice that the pics were too big.  You guys are too fast!