|
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Poos
1
« on: March 29, 2009, 02:32:42 am »
Chill out lounge has it so sussed, let me try and remember there setup in detail 1) awp is off but you can vote it off or on if admin allows 2) Good map rotation with the option to votemap 3) You can vote extend map but that automatically makes whole teams swap sides when it extends 4) Rank is reset every Sunday, u can see yr stats but no point in going mad abt temp rank 5) They have some fun maps to break it up a little 6) On fun maps you cant buy flashes 7) If one team is getting rolled server gives all players 16 k to even chances  If you shoot a team mate you instantly lose 30 hp, no one ever TK's on purpose 9) Has regular messages on the screen telling people to not complain like newbs and details on how to complain about bad admins 10) Admins on all the time 11) If you retry your score does not reset ( so u ever chill out or just leave) 12) You are able to bet your money on which team wins (makes speccing fun) 13) says monster kill etc when u doing well ( feels cool to hear) In the end the weekly rank reset and fun of betting plus no awps with good rotation of maps keeps it really interesting and a fun enviroment. There is a good reason II see most the old school iconz bois there
2
« on: March 26, 2009, 02:16:12 am »
Heaps of servers that aint dd2 and they are normally cranking, do what the chill out lounge and reset the rank once a week.
3
« on: March 19, 2009, 10:16:27 pm »
bro there is servers there for that man.. Yea I know those servers are there but if you took the dd2 server away alot of the whore would come play the normal server too. Funny enough I most the old school iconz players on an ozzy server most nights. The server is called the chill out lounge and in my opinion its set up perfectly. Has a good rotation, people can votemap, has ff, has relaxed but well admined enviroment. If it didnt hav ozzys on it would be perfect 
4
« on: March 08, 2009, 11:45:36 am »
Just so you know Watchmen is AWSOME :rnr:
5
« on: March 06, 2009, 02:13:05 am »
I play on Aussie servers now that run all popular scrim maps, lots of variety and still keeps the die hards happy too. Aww I liked Havana tooo GREAT MAP
6
« on: March 04, 2009, 10:47:20 am »
If you want to get the hard core players and the old school you need to have maps they will both play. Example, dd2, inferno, nuke, train (scrim maps) and maybe italy for the lols. Im keen as for that server:bigglasse
7
« on: February 13, 2009, 12:06:02 am »
On a fundamental genetic level. Evolution is impossible, and makes no sense what-so-ever.
Genetically we all come from one original woman, this woman, cannot have evolved from a single cell organism as humans are not progressively evolving. Infact, quite the opposite, all life is devolving. Becomming shorter, more suseptible to disease. Genetically, over a long time, we are all sub-par compared to our ancestors.
Enjoy that thought, even though we may leave this earth one day and inhabit other lands. Genetically, our race is doomed. Agreed with last comment, its not that we are devolving its that our lifestyle and environment is affecting our health badly which in turn alters genes in a negative way which we then pass on.
8
« on: February 02, 2009, 01:21:08 am »
Outlander was ok, the monster seemed abit shite to me graphics wise...but an easy watch anyway I thought it was suprisingly good
9
« on: August 30, 2008, 10:59:54 am »
Rofl at When Dirty harry meet Sally
10
« on: September 16, 2007, 01:31:17 pm »
Rofl that shirt is just classic:rnr:
11
« on: September 11, 2007, 10:23:18 am »
Apparently the last episode of sensing murder had the police going over what the pychics apparently found. From what I heard on the radio they helped alot, I messed it did anyone else see it?
Oh and you can believe in creation and reincarnation, creation is to say someone created the world and universe. The idea of a spiritual realm is a whole seperate issue. In saying that it wouldn't surprise me if the christian perspective was that limited.
12
« on: September 09, 2007, 10:10:15 am »
Rofl put that in the motivation images thread:bounce:
13
« on: September 08, 2007, 01:49:59 pm »
Wowwy - That hurt my lil wee brain.
The main goal of religion should be to be sincere. However like any organisation or group they develops there own fixed view and agenda (we want to be number one, we are right), often becomes corrupt at the top. Religion focuses on the out come of the after life. Phylosophy is generally better because if focuses on how to better your self now. Surely we can take the best from religion ( moral guide lines/ faith/ sincerity) and mix that in with broad and open discussion that teaches people how to think for them selves. This is about learning & evolving.
Now can I have my banana?
14
« on: August 27, 2007, 01:13:19 pm »
How about 50 goats with horns charging the mofo and owning him instead:rnr:
Stupid goats:disappoin
15
« on: August 26, 2007, 04:15:20 pm »
Because a mixture of both isnt a mixture of both. It infinitely regress's back to a lack of free will, which is why Nietzche(Who wrote 'Thus Spake Zarathrustra' which is what Zarathrustra is named after) denounced free will as an illusion.
I'll take your Iraq example for instance:
You're in Iraq. You want to get out. You go up to some random person in the street and ask for their help. They turn out to work at the Saudi embassy in Iraq and helps you to find the NZ embassy. They ship you out free of charge.
Scenario One:
You were predestined to find the guy and ask him to help you out: Predestiny 1, Free Will 0
Scenario Two:
It was a complete and utter accident driven by your random act to ask the nearest person for help. Predestiny 0, Free Will 1
Scenario Three:
Mixture of both(?!) - Free Will 0
Try using that example to clarify your argument because Im not seeing one there. And delete your other post you spammer :p The example here is way to limited in perspective and that is the problem. For example this example excludes all the relative factors that lead to this happening. The guy also had the choice to ask for help, the fact he was extremely fortunate in asking this man is another point all together. Many people would consider such luck as an act of good kama ( the benefits of past actions). Had he not made such past decisions then he may not have been fortunate enough to meet such a man, therefore pastdecicions awarded him this opportunity. If you believe in cause and consequence ( what goes around comes around) then you would understand that choices you made can lead to a certain destiny. The point im making is we need to look at the big picture, not just the main point while ignoring all the other influencing factors. Life is never that simple. Once again if you dont believe in free will then you dont believe we have a choice. So if we dont have free will then surely we cant be held accountable for anything we do? I would ask you to anwser this questions first of all.
16
« on: August 26, 2007, 02:46:14 pm »
What you talkin bout Willis?
If you replace the Casino with Life and the players with people then you come to realize: Life isnt about choosing, its about their being Choices. Although Nietzsche deny's the idea of free will the fact of the matter is: People still play IN the Casino, it just doesnt matter what they play.
It is the being there that influences the events, not the activity therein:
If you would like to investigate the idea further I suggest you learn about the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
How can you say being there is more important than the actions you take, your actions will normally shape the out come more than the location. Yes sure if your in Iraq the location will have a very strong influence, but even in the worst of locations/situations there is still normally a better decision to make. Once again this is another example of limited and extreme thinking. Why does it have to be either ffee or fixed, why cant it be a mixture of both?
17
« on: August 26, 2007, 02:44:58 pm »
What you talkin bout Willis?
If you replace the Casino with Life and the players with people then you come to realize: Life isnt about choosing, its about their being Choices. Although Nietzsche deny's the idea of free will the fact of the matter is: People still play IN the Casino, it just doesnt matter what they play.
It is the being there that influences the events, not the activity therein
If you would like to investigate the idea further I suggest you learn about the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox[/QUOTE]
18
« on: August 14, 2007, 12:40:22 pm »
Lol first of all im not religious, I dont want my thinking to be limited to a narrow perspective. Free will is another question all together. To say we dont have free will is to say that we should have no responsibility for our actions as we never had a choice.
To say that nothing is determined would be to say actions do not have consequences which is obviously not true. Its funny how some people want to believe its either one way or the other.
Obviously we have the free will to make choices, however your choices are still limited, therefore to a degree somethings are determined. You will get older and die however the quality and length of your life is greatly decided by your choices.
If you go back 100 years and look how far science as come, surely you we must consider that in another 100 years much of what we consider fact could be shot to hell. We really think we know so much now because of the boom in science and technology, but really we have bearly scratched the surface. Great advancements will come from those who think outside of what is accepted.
19
« on: August 13, 2007, 01:27:28 pm »
Rofl my mate who is a really cheeky prat had to jahovas witnesses knock on his door one morning. They asked him if he would like to learn about Jesus, to which he replied. I hear you guys dont believe in sex before marriage, Mr Johova replied in his American accent. Now we dont beleiev in sex before marriage. My friend then asked if either of them are married to which they both replied no. Lol so my mae said so your still both Virgins and still living on hand outs (he then did the tosser sign). Rofl both of them had such red faces after that then my mate shut the door.
Pretty mean but oh well, he never invited them to his house so..........:bigglasse
20
« on: August 12, 2007, 04:06:38 pm »
lol here is pudding thanks to a lil editing from malice ^^
21
« on: August 12, 2007, 02:59:22 pm »
Rofl if anyone has seen pudding before in photos you will like this one made by malice ^^
22
« on: August 12, 2007, 12:23:37 pm »
Lol they have provided very strong evidence to the theory. And if both have strong argument surely both sides should be heard and considered to reach the most plausible conclusion.
23
« on: August 12, 2007, 11:18:06 am »
You can't prove something doesn't exist if it doesn't exist to begin with. Umm yes you can, the argument over if it exists or not is because there is strong argument both ways.
24
« on: August 11, 2007, 05:07:46 pm »
If you use logic to reach a plausible conclusion about god i think you will find that all logic points to no god
if something cant be proved then, for all intents and purposes, it doesn't exist
you know the clock is man made because all the documented evidence of watchmakers
A good example is, if we look at a dog how do we know it is man made. Its obvious when you see all the moving parts that work together, chances are its beyond coincidence.
your point sucks Lol your points suck fool, you are forgetting my whole point is if god made animals and man then its obvious because its to coincidental. A dog would be something god made according to my example. Lol try looking at things more than one way. Even scientists who dont believe in a god agree that cant disprove it. Until you have conclusive fact to support he does not exist then you cannot reach a solid conclusion. For years science argued and still do that meridians dont exist. These are invisible electric currents used by acupuncturists, science said they dont exist despite millions of users knowing they do. Western scientist tried everything to explain things within the western scientific perspective. Now there is very strong evidence they exist, special cameras that can see them, they can be detected by current readers etc etc. But despite the over whelming facts some still refuse to accept it. As for reincarnation, if you believe there is a god and he is fair then surely you should believe in reincarnation. Do you really think if there was a god do you really think he would just let some people be crippled or some born in a third world country. If you choose to accept the most basic principle of the universe ( cause and consequence) then you should know that everything happens for a reason. Its like buying a car, if you dont have much money then you still have options but they are limited and not as good as some one with far more money. The religious word is karma which means to do. The smarter you make your self, the more wise your decisions the better your options, this is common sense. So if im born into a nice home with loving parents did I just get lucky, why some other poor bastard ends up in Iraq. So if you believe there is a god surely he we only do that for a good reason. This is the argument for reincarnation. There was a famous example in India where an uneducated Indian boy was able to do the most complex mathematical equations without training in his own language. Surely he could have been born with a brain that was better suited for maths but don't tell me he could figure out advance maths that involve a lifetime of study with no training because of good genes.
25
« on: August 06, 2007, 04:41:30 pm »
Bahahahahhaa
|
|
|
