Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312123Quote from: Spacemonkey;1312122Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312119QuoteTo build a complete model of the universe would take more energy the universe contains.Rofl although that is true i think you miss the point of the argument, in fact you are equivocating the fact that we are saying that the universe can be explained by science eventually, ie. that there wont be anything unexplainable, not that we will be able to predict anything and everything that is ever going to happen in the future, even though no matter what happened we would still be able to explain it using existing theories if they were complete.Science would still be able to explain and understand everything, it just would not be able to predict whats going to happen in the future using such a "model" which is absurd anyway seeing as the universe is probabilistic rather than deterministic.No, he explained it perfectly.Science can not explain everything about the universe (and everything else) where science itself is constricted by the laws of the universe itself.Errr, everything else?No i think youre missing the definition of universe : everything that exists anywhere.If something existed somewhere else, its still somewhere ergo its in the universe.Well, lets make the definition clear then.Our universe, which started with the Big Bang.But what about other universes?
Quote from: Spacemonkey;1312122Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312119QuoteTo build a complete model of the universe would take more energy the universe contains.Rofl although that is true i think you miss the point of the argument, in fact you are equivocating the fact that we are saying that the universe can be explained by science eventually, ie. that there wont be anything unexplainable, not that we will be able to predict anything and everything that is ever going to happen in the future, even though no matter what happened we would still be able to explain it using existing theories if they were complete.Science would still be able to explain and understand everything, it just would not be able to predict whats going to happen in the future using such a "model" which is absurd anyway seeing as the universe is probabilistic rather than deterministic.No, he explained it perfectly.Science can not explain everything about the universe (and everything else) where science itself is constricted by the laws of the universe itself.Errr, everything else?No i think youre missing the definition of universe : everything that exists anywhere.If something existed somewhere else, its still somewhere ergo its in the universe.
Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312119QuoteTo build a complete model of the universe would take more energy the universe contains.Rofl although that is true i think you miss the point of the argument, in fact you are equivocating the fact that we are saying that the universe can be explained by science eventually, ie. that there wont be anything unexplainable, not that we will be able to predict anything and everything that is ever going to happen in the future, even though no matter what happened we would still be able to explain it using existing theories if they were complete.Science would still be able to explain and understand everything, it just would not be able to predict whats going to happen in the future using such a "model" which is absurd anyway seeing as the universe is probabilistic rather than deterministic.No, he explained it perfectly.Science can not explain everything about the universe (and everything else) where science itself is constricted by the laws of the universe itself.
QuoteTo build a complete model of the universe would take more energy the universe contains.Rofl although that is true i think you miss the point of the argument, in fact you are equivocating the fact that we are saying that the universe can be explained by science eventually, ie. that there wont be anything unexplainable, not that we will be able to predict anything and everything that is ever going to happen in the future, even though no matter what happened we would still be able to explain it using existing theories if they were complete.Science would still be able to explain and understand everything, it just would not be able to predict whats going to happen in the future using such a "model" which is absurd anyway seeing as the universe is probabilistic rather than deterministic.
To build a complete model of the universe would take more energy the universe contains.
Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312125Can you give me an example?Anything beyond the event horizon of a black holeThe properties of objects in areas that are expanding faster than the speed of lightAnything outside your light cone, actually
Can you give me an example?
Anything outside your light cone, actually
^ What Spoon said, anything outside out light cone, the light will never reach it, no light, no evidence, nothing for science to explain.Which means science can never explain everything.
Quote from: Spacemonkey;1312137^ What Spoon said, anything outside out light cone, the light will never reach it, no light, no evidence, nothing for science to explain.Which means science can never explain everything.By light cone you do mean what you see with your eyes right?Because the visible universe is a sphere, just in case youre talking about something like that?
Just wondering, Rice... How can you be certain your level of belief is the correct one? I mean, how do you know that your interperetation (which is indeed something completely separate from the morals taught by the old testament) is the correct interperetation over say, the Christian from another church next door, who may indeed be destined to go to heaven where you are determined to go to hell?You say your faith is based on your personal relationship with Jesus, and follow his morals written in the New Testament, and that's what will eventually get you into heaven. How do you know his teachings, or indeed his existence, to be true?
Because the visible universe is a sphere, just in case youre talking about something like that?
Quote from: Dr_Woohoo;1312103If the universe is finite, then the number of things there are to be explained must also be finite, even if the number is obscenely large.But then you would need to explain why the universe is finite, and the possibility of other universe.However much we learn, we will also keeping learning that there is so much more we don't understand.
If the universe is finite, then the number of things there are to be explained must also be finite, even if the number is obscenely large.
ITT: Blop telling you you've missed the point.
I mean, some of these issues might have solutions. We might find a flawless method of instant communication, which would mostly solve the light cone problem. The universe may not actually have areas that move faster than the speed of light, so that might be irrelevant. But the Black hole thing, well. What little we do know of black holes is that they are very effective at destroying information. Even if we somehow someday get perfect information back from inside the black hole there are still thousands of black swan events and objects out there that will baffle all explanation. Science's progress in understanding everything is a hyperbola, I think it would be very boring otherwise.
while we are on the subject blop, do you think n = np? show your working
Quote from: Spoonguard;1312156while we are on the subject blop, do you think n = np? show your working Im assuming you mean p=np or p=!np, if I knew that I would be very rich indeed, if it was the former i would be inside your bank acccount steealing your cash monies right now.
Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312157Quote from: Spoonguard;1312156while we are on the subject blop, do you think n = np? show your working Im assuming you mean p=np or p=!np, if I knew that I would be very rich indeed, if it was the former i would be inside your bank acccount steealing your cash monies right now.yeh, a typo. Do you think it will ever be solved?
Quote from: Spoonguard;1312158Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312157Quote from: Spoonguard;1312156while we are on the subject blop, do you think n = np? show your working Im assuming you mean p=np or p=!np, if I knew that I would be very rich indeed, if it was the former i would be inside your bank acccount steealing your cash monies right now.yeh, a typo. Do you think it will ever be solved?Perhaps, but maybe not in polynomial time
Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312161Quote from: Spoonguard;1312158Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312157Quote from: Spoonguard;1312156while we are on the subject blop, do you think n = np? show your working Im assuming you mean p=np or p=!np, if I knew that I would be very rich indeed, if it was the former i would be inside your bank acccount steealing your cash monies right now.yeh, a typo. Do you think it will ever be solved?Perhaps, but maybe not in polynomial time soooooooOoOOOooo how does this not apply to the universe at large? I'm very confused. Genuinely confused, not that sophism I was dicking around with earlier. Is there some infinite time in the universe I am not aware of?
Quote from: Spoonguard;1312164Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312161Quote from: Spoonguard;1312158Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312157Quote from: Spoonguard;1312156while we are on the subject blop, do you think n = np? show your working Im assuming you mean p=np or p=!np, if I knew that I would be very rich indeed, if it was the former i would be inside your bank acccount steealing your cash monies right now.yeh, a typo. Do you think it will ever be solved?Perhaps, but maybe not in polynomial time soooooooOoOOOooo how does this not apply to the universe at large? I'm very confused. Genuinely confused, not that sophism I was dicking around with earlier. Is there some infinite time in the universe I am not aware of?Perhaps jokes about p=!np cannot be solved outside a math department in polynomial time either rofl Actually you could do some freaky shit whereby you fly around the universe at 0.9..(infinity many nines)..9c for an infinite amount of time, and when you come back down to your initial velocity youre idea of the inifinte amount of time that has passed will be different from the rest of the universe, in fact their time will be several orders of infinity (lmao) longer.
This talk of powers of infinities sounds dangerously like moving outside of the universe.
QuoteThis talk of powers of infinities sounds dangerously like moving outside of the universe. No more than to say that the real numbers are infinitely more infinite than the natural numbers.Or that there if an infinite amount of infinisteimally small distances between you and me, and if you make each of those infinitesimal increments infinitesimally smaller by dividing it into infinitely many infinitesimal parts you will have infinitely many more infinitesimal parts.Haha
Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312175QuoteThis talk of powers of infinities sounds dangerously like moving outside of the universe. No more than to say that the real numbers are infinitely more infinite than the natural numbers.Or that there if an infinite amount of infinisteimally small distances between you and me, and if you make each of those infinitesimal increments infinitesimally smaller by dividing it into infinitely many infinitesimal parts you will have infinitely many more infinitesimal parts.HahaOr instead of outrunning that arrow that is moving faster than you I just fucking stab you >:-(
Quote from: Spoonguard;1312180Quote from: Blob_ZPS;1312175QuoteThis talk of powers of infinities sounds dangerously like moving outside of the universe. No more than to say that the real numbers are infinitely more infinite than the natural numbers.Or that there if an infinite amount of infinisteimally small distances between you and me, and if you make each of those infinitesimal increments infinitesimally smaller by dividing it into infinitely many infinitesimal parts you will have infinitely many more infinitesimal parts.HahaOr instead of outrunning that arrow that is moving faster than you I just fucking stab you >:-(Perhaps I'll just escape through a wormhole.
So I am not allowed to tunnel out of the universe but you can. Unfair.