I’ve always been a fan of determinism.
I love that this thread was started by some guy that calls himself "m3th".
Maybe there is a deeper theological reason why the insurers won't cover acts of god, it's his house after all, and they generally don't cover intentional damage to ones own property. So it wouldn't have been covered anyway.But what about if it was another god? They should change the policy to read "acts of gods" just to be sure there are no legal outs.
Thou shall have no other god than me.
Such a very amazing link! Thanks you for the post.
Cats have no soul.