when were poodles created?
Vast majority of people would disagree about your statement that a behemoth was a dinosaur.wiki for startershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behemoth
potassium argon dating is used to date minerals, not fossils.heres the first link i found using google, mr science man http://hypertextbook.com/physics/modern/half-life/maybe you're not as clued up as you think you are, or that you tell people you are anyway.
Yeah interestly enough Blackheart. Only one religion actually claims they are the only way to get to God. That is in fact Christianity when Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one gets to the father except thrrough me."Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet... if a prophet cannot lie (their belief) then there is no point being muslim, cos Jesus said only he could save right...Most other religions have a theory along the "Karma, or Nirvana" lines.The choice is therefore easier, cos if the others are right (not Christianity for instance), then really you lose nothing, whereas if Christianity is the way then its the only way to heaven.
Actually it sates in the first sentence that it is for determining the age of previously living things. But make up whatever else you want too... and FYI are you just searching and pasting or actually reading...
I probably would considering that cars were invneted rather recently my friend.Laws predate Christianity true, yet qwhen did they begin? The basis of our legal system is actually found in Leviticus in the bible...When you have an open mind one sees this sort of thing..
Having read that link - it accually doesn't diagree with me if you read to the end...
Cheers man, i always read a post at a time and reply. Theres just so much to say.:bounce:
People are drawn to religion because they want spiritual guidance. Religion provides a blueprint on how to live your life, and a solid grounding. I think that's a prefectly resonable thing to want and good luck to those people.The truth is in the message not the details of whether turning water into wine is actually possible etc. When religion tries to do what science is for ie explain the natural universe - it just gets pwned so bad.Religion has been getting pwned on a regular basis since Copernicus, Galileo etc. They need a new coach!
Given your guys lack of understanding of dating methods i can understand why you don't believe the bible.Basic 5th form chem.... Potassium is soluble. The major dating method other that carbon dating is a method called potassium argon testing. Were there a major flood as descibed in Genesis, this would simply destroy the evolutionary dating practise for well anything. It is amuzing reading your posts about science given they never contact any science above 4th form. I think it niave to accept anything without testing it from a neutral point of view - in fact its like walking into a bank for a home loan and saying "you guys are the guys i want to have my mortgage with - cheerzs." It would be stupid to not look to all the options and then decide, based on evidence. Yet at every turn your arguement has been to attack our credibility for believing the bible, yet you have never presented any credible facts to support your religious evolutionist theories. The science you do mention has inherrent flaws that can easily be spotted, and quite frankly usually are by average people when studying a B Sc.All the best.
When hannibal posts it's like I can see forever.
Its also biased to believe that science discredits the bible, when i can infact reinforce it on many occassions.
Oh and good post with that vid Tiwa, i was writing a post in this thread which was along similar lines, but now i don't need to.
Yes SM, you are right. And really as there is no evidence either way you could never calculate the probability of either situation occuring.One thing i've been realising recently is that a lot of people here tend to use science to compliement their belief that there is no god. Science may discredit a particular denomination of religion, such as christianity, islam, or whatever - but these are just interpretations of the existance of god. And as an interpretation they could be very wrong.To say that god does not exist simply for this fact is wrong. What you should be saying is that the christian interpretation of god does not exist as it is described in the bible.To rule out the possibility of "god" based upon the bible is very narrow minded in my opinion.
i don't think you've looked very hard at other religions.
If it's not short and sweet, it better be fuckin awesome.
This is one of the reasons why Im out of this discussion: Any clear point Im going to make is going to take at least 3 minutes to read, and thats just nasty. Forums are for entertainment not lectures!
I dont really think anyone around here has done this, dont you?
i'm afraid you are deluded if you think that science compliments that which is written in the bible. That which science does compliement christianity upon is but a grain of sand on a beach of condemnation.I know it's hard when someone discredits what you believe in, i mean no offence. I am mearly pointing out the evidence is stacked against christianities explanation of existance.
These religious discussions are great for getting your post count up without it looking like spam.+1
As I said, faith is the font from which all religon drinks. But it is also where all belief comes from. Therefore: belief is less important than faith.People have blinded themselves to that simple fact
Yeah interestly enough Blackheart. Only one religion actually claims they are the only way to get to God. That is in fact Christianity when Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one gets to the father except thrrough me."
Ima pull you up on that one. A clear point is not something that takes 3 minutes to read in my book.
The graviton deflector dish is part of the navigational array. During the development of warp travel it was realized that an object travelling at warp speeds would ultimately collide with objects and although not affected by relative speeds the interaction between the relative and non-relative travelling particles would result in instantaneous de-molecularization of both objects, in other words: Anhillation.However: Due to the low-level field effect generated by both the warp engines and travelling speed a focal point was found which could focus these two forces to repel objects via the directing of gravitons(the ultimate particle which has yet to be found in RL). Thusly small objects will not collide with a space craft due to the deflector dish constantly emitting gravitons. This was also one of the key steps in the development of deflector shielding.
well i carried on to this link http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/The_Truth_About_Behemothand reading more, the bible quote mentions a navel. Only mammals have navels , dinosaurs do not.
