^^^I made the Mithra/Mothra joke on page 115.But your photo is way better than mine
Different religions will never agree with each other about whats right, however we can still use logic which in its self is a science to reach the most plausible conclusions.
And yes even scientist now have to accept that god can niether be proven is or disproved.
A good example is, if we look at a clock how do we know it is man made. Its obvious when you see all the moving parts that work together, chances are its beyond coincidence. Man was able to predict the world was round before he could ever travel it through logic.
Either way, whether God is involved or not, reincarnation seems to be based on the idea of the soul, or spirit, so it seems to be relevant to this thread ... thoughts?
But then again remembering the past could be some form of quantum effect, perhaps the thoughts of the individual that died somehow passed to the receptive mind of the child?
As for telling children a lie repeatedly until their mullable minds accept it as truth...
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/
It's not possible. When you die, your brain stops working. You are your brain. If your brain isn't alive anymore you can't think.
In high-profile cases of reincarnation, this is ruled out very early on as a cause.
um.... link to evidence pleasereincarnation is nonsense, there are thousands of people who claim to be Cleopatra reincarnated
Wiki Article on Reincarnation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReincarnationWiki article on the book Twenty Cases Suggstive of Reincaration, by Ian Stevenson: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Cases_Suggestive_of_ReincarnationI think it is nonsense as well, but it intrigues me that there are still compelling cases which seem to support the view of reincarnation; that leads me to think maybe it is feasible in some kind of form, but in a scientific as opposed to spiritual way (as I mentioned, either via a transfer of energy or something like that).An interesting fact I once read was that around 90% of the atoms in our body once belonged to someone else, and were passed on due to decomposition and movement of atoms and stuff (read it in Bill Brysons book A Short History of Nearly Everything). Maybe that has something to do with it?On the funny side, General George Patton believed he was Hannibal reincarnated, and Henry Ford believed he was a reincarnation of a soldier who died at Gettysburg in the American Civil War.
yeah..........no it couldn't
I'm intrigued by you're apparent confidence in this assertion, it's as if you believe you know the truth of the matter. How is it you know that this is outside the realms of possibility?
If you use logic to reach a plausible conclusion about god i think you will find that all logic points to no godif something cant be proved then, for all intents and purposes, it doesn't existyou know the clock is man made because all the documented evidence of watchmakers A good example is, if we look at a dog how do we know it is man made. Its obvious when you see all the moving parts that work together, chances are its beyond coincidence. your point sucks
Lol your points suck fool, you are forgetting my whole point is if god made animals and man then its obvious because its to coincidental. A dog would be something god made according to my example. Lol try looking at things more than one way.Even scientists who dont believe in a god agree that cant disprove it. Until you have conclusive fact to support he does not exist then you cannot reach a solid conclusion. For years science argued and still do that meridians dont exist. These are invisible electric currents used by acupuncturists, science said they dont exist despite millions of users knowing they do. Western scientist tried everything to explain things within the western scientific perspective. Now there is very strong evidence they exist, special cameras that can see them, they can be detected by current readers etc etc. But despite the over whelming facts some still refuse to accept it.
so either your god is pretty shitty at making things or perhaps, just perhaps we evolved
so whats the point of this argument then