what if you drive this?
I just generally have a distaste for motorcyclists like I do cyclists (not commuters, but lycra clad douche lords).Sure, there are decent folk out there who ride bikes, but I see far too many lane splitting, neglecting to indicate, casually drifting between lanes on multi-laned highways and riding on the coat-tails of drivers.BUT there are also an equal ratio of fuckbag car drivers.Just human nature I suppose no matter what vehicle you drive.
having to constantly fiddle the throttle, clutch and brake is really really hard.
I bet you $10.00 the Range rover driver upgrades his SUV to this beast after this debacle.
Range Rover panics and plows through one of the Riders breaking his back (dude might not walk again)
Guys,I wanna buy some shit from DX.comwill the american shut down make buying shit online cheaper soonish?peace and love
Police believe some of the bikers belong to a gang known as Hollywood Stuntz. They said the motorcyclists were part of a planned but unauthorized event in which hundreds of riders gathered outside of Manhattan, with the intent of driving into Times Square en masse.
Christopher Cruz, 28, of New Jersey, was charged with reckless endangerment, reckless driving, endangering the welfare of a child and menacing. Quoting police sources, the New York Daily News reports that while out riding with a mob of bikers Cruz swerved in front of a SUV and caused the driver to bump his back tire.
Just stuff from stuff.http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/9234892/Biker-gangs-terror-chase-Rider-paralysedhttp://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/9252503/Six-bikers-stomped-on-drivers-headThe bikers who beat up the SUV driver have also been charged.
Hmmmm, I disagree that the driver of the SUV shouldn't be charged - if the motorcyclists can be charged for assault after pursuing someone who was fleeing an accident (especially after witnessing that person run over a bunch of their friends), then surely the driver can be charged with assault with a deadly weapon (the SUV). My point here is that in both instances, illegal actions were commited and in both, there are exceptional circumstances and yet only one has been charged to go before the courts to decide guilt/responsibility.I also suspect that there is more to the story - I suspect that after the bump, the SUV driver stayed in his vehicle, didn't get out to talk with the person he just bumped (like you should after any accident, even if it was caused by someone being a dick) - I think this is what would have set the group off in the first place. And before you ask - I don't have anything to back my suspicions up - just conjecture.
Hmmmm, I disagree that the driver of the SUV shouldn't be charged - if the motorcyclists can be charged for assault after pursuing someone who was fleeing an accident (especially after witnessing that person run over a bunch of their friends), then surely the driver can be charged with assault with a deadly weapon (the SUV). My point here is that in both instances, illegal actions were commited and in both,
I also suspect that there is more to the story - I suspect that after the bump, the SUV driver stayed in his vehicle, didn't get out to talk with the person he just bumped (like you should after any accident, even if it was caused by someone being a dick) - I think this is what would have set the group off in the first place.
waht?Do go on.
