iPhone 5

[swindle]

Smashing.

[Apostrophe Spacemonkey]

Where can I get an iCoffee?

[Emrico1]

Dunno, But I'm sure you'll be forced to line up. They only have limited supply you know.

[Apostrophe Spacemonkey]

Dunno, But I'm sure you'll be forced to line up. They only have limited supply you know.

I got a iCoffee yesterday, but I head this new iCoffee has a different shaped lid which allows for faster drinking, but it doesn't fit on the old iCoffee cups.

And it's taller!

[monpepe]

But the cups only work with one type of coffee made in a certain way.

[Apostrophe Spacemonkey]

But the cups only work with one type of coffee made in a certain way.

There is this coffee shop you can go to where they can 'unlock' your coffee cup so you can drink other types of coffee.

However it voids your warranty.

[swindle]

Sounds like an amazing deal to me. I'll take 3.

[Retardobot]

Where can I get an iCoffee?

iCoco

http://www.icoco.co.nz

LOL - website doesn't even work, fitting.

[Apostrophe Spacemonkey]

iCoco

http://www.icoco.co.nz

LOL - website doesn't even work, fitting.

It worked for me.

You have to be drinking an iCoffee while viewing the website for it to work.

[Emrico1]

Screw you haters. It comes in a nice white cup so I am happy to pay extra. I know nothing of coffee but at least I think I look cooler while I am drinking from it. Smugness is worth the premium.

[BerG]

iCoco

http://www.icoco.co.nz

LOL - website doesn't even work, fitting.

Wouldnt say fitting.

iOS, while not the most feature rich, has got to be the most stable OS.

[monpepe]

you can buy the iMUG though, which is bigger than the iCUP. That way you can get more coffee but its not as portable.

[Retardobot]

Wouldnt say fitting.

iOS, while not the most feature rich, has got to be the most stable OS.

I didn't really mean an iPhone per say, just Apple as whole.

Their shares seem to be dropping and their legal team is hemorrhaging money chasing ridiculous lawsuits (and losing them).

[Apostrophe Spacemonkey]

Have have Apple not made the iWatch yet?

[Emrico1]

Wouldnt say fitting.

iOS, while not the most feature rich, has got to be the most stable OS.

You know that iOS apps have a higher crash rate than android right?

[mattnz]

And it had better be pretty fucking stable running on only one hardware set.

[O-L-W-A-G]

You know that iOS apps have a higher crash rate than android right?

Sauce?
Never had an iOS app crash on me, some Cydia apps have though

[Emrico1]

Sauce?
Never had an iOS app crash on me, some Cydia apps have though

Google it

[Codex]

I have heaps of ios apps crash on me when I had my iphone, was fucking annoying

[Emrico1]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2012/02/02/does-ios-crash-more-than-android-a-data-dive/

[.osiRiS]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2012/02/02/does-ios-crash-more-than-android-a-data-dive/

Can I have my 3 mins back for reading that rubbish? Too many variables in that so called 'study' to mean anything.

Splitting hairs at even 'their' results 0.69% being the difference.

[Bell]

Splitting hairs at even 'their' results 0.69% being the difference.

lol, is it really?
Did you just see a small number and therefore completely dismiss it? Some good Fox News logic there.

That number represents the increased chance of an app failing between andriod and apple per run.
The fail rate at worst is only %3.6 so %0.69 is actually a significant proportional difference.
Put into proportional terms.... A 3rd quartile IOS app is %20 more likely to fail on startup compared to an Andriod App

And how about looking at the 1st quartile, the top tier IOS apps are 3.4 times more likely to crash compared to their Andriod counterparts.

Which I don't think is splitting hairs and if true is very good rebuttal to what Berg said.

[mattnz]

lol, is it really?
Did you just see a small number and therefore completely dismiss it? Some good Fox News logic there.

That number represents the increased chance of an app failing between andriod and apple per run.
The fail rate at worst is only %3.6 so %0.69 is actually a significant proportional difference.
Put into proportional terms.... A 3rd quartile IOS app is %20 more likely to fail on startup compared to an Andriod App

And how about looking at the 1st quartile, the top tier IOS apps are 3.4 times more likely to crash compared to their Andriod counterparts.

Which I don't think is splitting hairs and if true is very good rebuttal to what Berg said.

Yeah pretty much this.

I think a lot of people get confused when dealing with percentages of a percentage. Honestly when I mark 100-level papers, I have not seen a single person get it right.

Say I (hypothetically) get a sample of 100 for a survey of transportation methods. I find that 75 people primarily use a car, and 15 people primarily use a motorbike (i.e. 75% and 15% respectively).

Now the absolute difference between these two figures is 60 percentage points. It should be clear, however, that it's not correct to say 60% more people use a car than a motorbike.

From those figures 400% more people primarily use cars than motorbikes.

In the same way, Bell is just so right in pointing out that, actually, top tier iOS apps are 240% more likely to crash than their Android equivalents. The contrast between 1st quartile apps is actually the most stark, although there is clearly a floor effect (i.e. an app can't crash less than 0% of the time).

But yeah, educational rant, hopefully someone learns something about data analysis.

[BerG]

Ok, you got me.

[.osiRiS]

You can go on your figures all you want but you have totally different test environments. iOS 5 just released to the masses compared to android with little to no uptake on the release at the time.