It's been updated with a mea culpa that it performs on par with a stock 980ti, not the OC edition they were using :-)Ars has a pretty good article over here : http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/06/amd-fury-x-reviews-show-strong-4k-performance-but-doesnt-beat-980-ti-overall/Basically they are saying it's not an NVIDIA slayer, but it is a huge leap for AMD, they've never before been able to go toe to toe with NVIDIA's top performance cards. AMD has always been about bang for your buck, but now it's fighting for the performance crown too, which is kind of cool.
I agree I'd choose the NVIDIA at that price point, but AMD has never had a card before that's even close to being the same power as an NVIDIA flagship. EVER.. The fact they now have one even if less than perfect is still a win for AMD.
...is still a win for AMD.
Eh, I've had SLi cards for.... 6/7 years. I don't actually run SLi because it won't support three monitors on my system.Not to mention some games just don't do SLi well.It's just a pain. Single card seems like such a nicer option.
LOL AMD
Is it only I who thinks the existence of the card is a good thing?